Comments on: Innovation and Invention

By: Kulbir Saini

Kulbir Saini — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:19:38 +0000

@Authority yeah .. reality may be different!

By: authority

authority — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:29:05 +0000

just an impressive complex philosophical attempt by the speaker to forcefully create a difference between two terms. sounds good but reality might differ from this .

By: Kulbir Saini

Kulbir Saini — Sat, 27 Dec 2008 06:55:17 +0000

@Abhishek Thank for defining research. I think you know research better than me 😀
@Gopal You have experienced research. So I can’t comment about your comment 🙂
@Shrikant can’t agree more!!

By: shrikant

shrikant — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 03:20:45 +0000

undoubtedly the best ppt of this placement season. 🙂
perhaps the only best thing of this placement season 🙁

By: Gopal

Gopal — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:04:09 +0000

I disagree. There is a *need* in inventing the bulb. If not something called bulb, a single source of light lightening up a huge space, is the need during those times of candles and oil lamps, where electricity played a role in penetration. It’s just as internet is playing a role in moving everything online.

So, to me it appears that the *need* compels you to (re)search some way out, which leads to the dumbest boredom, where the innovation is bred and nurtured. Finally it’s this innovation that fosters invention.

Ah! It’s just my thought, sorry if it appears bizzare 😛

By: Abhishek Sainani

Abhishek Sainani — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:22:24 +0000

Nicely defined invention and innovation! 🙂
according to me, research is re-search, or again searching for “something”, as in a solution or a new problem definition! 🙁
For me, research is like running in a jungle, only lucky ones or ones who know the exact path get to get out of the jungle 🙁